The Theory of An Anger Filled Square

Disclaimer: This theory is may not be an accurate interpretation. It is a general assumption and personal perception.

This is by no means a schematic representation of the theory

Assumptions:

I am A.
A and D had shared this secret B and never C knew.
A, B, C and D are angry people

Hypothesis:

A is not in the wrong.

Theoretical Background:

One fine day, A decided to tell B a secret about her personal life. A made B promise never to breathe a word to a single soul. B on the other hand, found the secret too overwhelming, had to open his big fat mouth, and let C into the secret.

On another day, D was telling C about the same secret as well. C admitted into knowing the secret even before D told him. Then, A found out through D that C actually knew the secret! A was way too disappointed in B, so A confronted B about it. And B confronted C. And C confronted D. And D confronted A. This is a chain reaction, which inadvertedly forms the Square of Anger.

Results:

B started yelling at C for not acting blur about knowing the secret. And i'm assuming that C is mad at D for telling A who he had heard the secret from (ie, B). And because C was mad at D, D blew his top by yelling over the phone when he called A. D even told A that why the fuck A had to confront D about it. KNN! It's A secret's who was being leaked out, why can't A confront the person who let the cat out of the bag?

Discussion:

Of course, at this point of time, A felt that she didn't even desereved to be fucking yelled at. It was fucking ppl like B, C, D who leaked A's secret! On what basis, do they have the fucking right to be mad at A. If anything, A should be the one getting pissed at B, C, D.

A didn't take things to heart, so wasn't all that mad at B for opening his big fat mouth. however, i think C was annoyed, because B yelled at him. Theoretically speaking, he shouldn't even be annoyed because he didn't keep the damn secret! He had to admit it.. See, this brings me to another theory on Reverse Psychology. If you want a person to admit something, sometimes you gotta probe them this way. People would usually fall for it, and admit things innocently.
Now A's pretty pissed off at D for yelling at her for no rhyme or fucking reason. great how nice to be misunderstood for the 295584098th time! Its not like i'm not used to it.

Conclusion:

Never trust guys with your secrets. They appear less gossipy than us girls, but they definitely have bigger mouths than us. No one else (except my girlfriends) will know anything about me, or my personal life ever.
The hypothesis should thus, be accepted.


And to B:
I'll let this off. And i'm sorry that the circle of trust between us have been broken. Somethings lost are lost forever. And i'm sorry if i've caused damages in your friendship between C and D. I'd rather we lose our friendship, than having you lose their friendship. You need brothers! Girls can't always be your life long friends. Since you guys always say "women are trouble".

And to C & D:
I'm sorry that you guys got yelled at. But secrets are not called secrets for nothing.Somethings are better left unsaid. I hope things will go well between B and all of you. I'm sorry for the unnecessary disputes amongst the 3 of you and for living up to your universal brotherhood principle of "women are trouble". It never was my intention to create a huge mess. I didn't expect things would turn out like that.


And with that, i rest my case.

And for people reading this, you won't know what the fuck i'm talking about unless you're B, C, or D.